<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mindcasting versus Lifecasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jenleereeves.com/2009/04/mindcasting-versus-lifecasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2009/04/mindcasting-versus-lifecasting/</link>
	<description>Sharing my new media thoughts to the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What a year &#171; New Media Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2009/04/mindcasting-versus-lifecasting/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>What a year &#171; New Media Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenleereeves.com/?p=476#comment-528</guid>
		<description>[...] I became more mindful towards what I wrote and started to mindcast more. I explained my thoughts on lifecasting/mindcasting earlier in 2009. I think I still believe in a combination of mind/lifecasting. But I toned down the life portions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I became more mindful towards what I wrote and started to mindcast more. I explained my thoughts on lifecasting/mindcasting earlier in 2009. I think I still believe in a combination of mind/lifecasting. But I toned down the life portions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Reeves</title>
		<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2009/04/mindcasting-versus-lifecasting/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenleereeves.com/?p=476#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Thanks you guys... It really seems like the more people I talk to, the more either mindcast or mix it together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you guys&#8230; It really seems like the more people I talk to, the more either mindcast or mix it together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Grey</title>
		<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2009/04/mindcasting-versus-lifecasting/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenleereeves.com/?p=476#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Personally, I do both on my twitter.  I use twitter for business, and the best thing about the program is giving me the ability to show viewers not only what&#039;s coming up tonight on the news... but that I&#039;m a real person with a personality!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I do both on my twitter.  I use twitter for business, and the best thing about the program is giving me the ability to show viewers not only what&#8217;s coming up tonight on the news&#8230; but that I&#8217;m a real person with a personality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Putnam</title>
		<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2009/04/mindcasting-versus-lifecasting/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Putnam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenleereeves.com/?p=476#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Great topic. I think &quot;mindcasting&quot; and &quot;lifecasting&quot; are excellent ways to describe concepts that people have been subconsciously aware of for a while.

Silly as it sounds, it took me a while to realize that I need to be more selective about whom I follow on Twitter. But in general, I dislike lifecasting and tend to favor mindcasting. In my own blog, I started it with the intention of staying away from strict calendar-like lifecasting (&quot;10:30am: I&#039;m at Reporting,&quot; etc.), but I think I&#039;ve since found a balance that I&#039;m comfortable with.

I guess I think that it&#039;s important to follow the lifecasts of only those real-life acquaintances that you want to keep up with. In general, I think mindcasts are the more useful of the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great topic. I think &#8220;mindcasting&#8221; and &#8220;lifecasting&#8221; are excellent ways to describe concepts that people have been subconsciously aware of for a while.</p>
<p>Silly as it sounds, it took me a while to realize that I need to be more selective about whom I follow on Twitter. But in general, I dislike lifecasting and tend to favor mindcasting. In my own blog, I started it with the intention of staying away from strict calendar-like lifecasting (&#8220;10:30am: I&#8217;m at Reporting,&#8221; etc.), but I think I&#8217;ve since found a balance that I&#8217;m comfortable with.</p>
<p>I guess I think that it&#8217;s important to follow the lifecasts of only those real-life acquaintances that you want to keep up with. In general, I think mindcasts are the more useful of the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2009/04/mindcasting-versus-lifecasting/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenleereeves.com/?p=476#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Good storytelling needs both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good storytelling needs both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Reeves</title>
		<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2009/04/mindcasting-versus-lifecasting/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenleereeves.com/?p=476#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Exactly! That&#039;s why it was so difficult to get out of that conversation when Twitter doesn&#039;t force you to read or converse with anyone. I guess I just need to keep educating about how these tools can be helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly! That&#8217;s why it was so difficult to get out of that conversation when Twitter doesn&#8217;t force you to read or converse with anyone. I guess I just need to keep educating about how these tools can be helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cusumano</title>
		<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2009/04/mindcasting-versus-lifecasting/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cusumano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenleereeves.com/?p=476#comment-394</guid>
		<description>I think I tend to mindcast over lifecast, but one reason for that is that I can&#039;t get to Twitter wit my my mobile phone (yeah, how lame am I?).

Not sure if I tweet any differently for work than I do for my personal life, and I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d want to tweet differently for the two. I think it&#039;s important to use twitter (as a journalist) the same way our readers use it. To constantly use it just to promote yourself blatantly is to become ignored, and I think that&#039;s something a lot of news organizations haven&#039;t gotten yet. Like anything else, I think it comes down to if you&#039;re interesting, or if you&#039;re not.

Regarding the danger of someone being annoyed by your tweeting pattern, one way to view Twitter is as a radio. You can jump from station to station, and you&#039;re not going to like everything you hear. And when that happens, you&#039;re free to move to a different station. Twitter is the same...except everyone is a station. Don&#039;t like what you hear, you&#039;re free to move on (stop following).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I tend to mindcast over lifecast, but one reason for that is that I can&#8217;t get to Twitter wit my my mobile phone (yeah, how lame am I?).</p>
<p>Not sure if I tweet any differently for work than I do for my personal life, and I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d want to tweet differently for the two. I think it&#8217;s important to use twitter (as a journalist) the same way our readers use it. To constantly use it just to promote yourself blatantly is to become ignored, and I think that&#8217;s something a lot of news organizations haven&#8217;t gotten yet. Like anything else, I think it comes down to if you&#8217;re interesting, or if you&#8217;re not.</p>
<p>Regarding the danger of someone being annoyed by your tweeting pattern, one way to view Twitter is as a radio. You can jump from station to station, and you&#8217;re not going to like everything you hear. And when that happens, you&#8217;re free to move to a different station. Twitter is the same&#8230;except everyone is a station. Don&#8217;t like what you hear, you&#8217;re free to move on (stop following).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
