<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emotions were let loose!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jenleereeves.com/2008/06/emotions-were-let-loose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2008/06/emotions-were-let-loose/</link>
	<description>Sharing my new media thoughts to the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:24:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Thornburg</title>
		<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2008/06/emotions-were-let-loose/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Thornburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenleereeves.com/2008/06/21/emotions-were-let-loose/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice summary. I&#039;ve posted a written version of my comments at http://is.gd/E7u

I welcome the comments of you and your readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice summary. I&#8217;ve posted a written version of my comments at <a href="http://is.gd/E7u" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/E7u</a></p>
<p>I welcome the comments of you and your readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.jenleereeves.com/2008/06/emotions-were-let-loose/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jenleereeves.com/2008/06/21/emotions-were-let-loose/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>They continued the discussion in the morning and organizers agreed that there was no consensus on the report about journalism education.  Sounds like they&#039;ll be considering notions of limiting it to master&#039;s only program, or perhaps distinguish between accredited and non-accredited programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They continued the discussion in the morning and organizers agreed that there was no consensus on the report about journalism education.  Sounds like they&#8217;ll be considering notions of limiting it to master&#8217;s only program, or perhaps distinguish between accredited and non-accredited programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
